Login Register

Victory for campaigners as B5000 industry plans thrown out

By Tamworth Herald  |  Posted: August 23, 2014

  • Delighted: Cllr Madge has welcomed news of the appeal's dismissal.

Comments (1)

A TAMWORTH councillor has welcomed the dismissal of a highly-debated planning application.

Cllr Tony Madge, for Stonydelph, has spoken to the Herald of his delight after an application to build on land off the busy Glascote Road was thrown out by the Planning Inspectorate last week.

The application for cluster of industrial units on land off the B5000 was dismissed by Tamworth Borough Council's planning committee back in February 2014.

An appeal was then lodged by Sibson Mill Properties which has now been dismissed by Inspector Victoria Lucas-Gosnold, appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government.

Cllr Madge described the outcome as "excellent news". "The nice thing is that common sense has prevailed and it's the local people that have won," said Cllr Madge, who spoke out against the proposals prior to being voted on to the council in May.

"Everyone said the people wouldn't win it from the start but they fought it hard and won."

If approved, the site would been been home to 12 light industrial units plus associated access, parking and refuse areas.

At the heart of original objections were fears over destroying a natural habitat, with particular reference to badgers.

This was re-addressed in Inspector Lucas-Gosnold's findings. Explaining the decision to refuse permission, her report says: "The main issue is the effect of the development proposed on protected species, specifically bats and badgers.

"Drawing matters together, there is a reasonable suspicion that bats are present on the appeal site. Badgers are also active on the site.

"I have found that, in the absence of a detailed bat survey, badger survey and badger mitigation strategy, there is insufficient information before me to assess whether the proposal would be harmful to bats or badgers. Both bats and badgers are protected species and this matter therefore attracts significant weight."

Inspector Lucas-Gosnold noted that the proposal would "incorporate some biodiversity mitigation and enhancement measures which would be of some environmental benefit".

She also highlighted that the proposal would create additional jobs "both during the construction and operational phases of the industrial units".

But, she concluded: "Therefore, whilst the benefits of the proposal are recognised, I consider that they do not outweigh the harm that I have identified."

Cllr Madge added: "This decision to dismiss the appeal has vindicated the hard work put in by all concerned and the decision of the planning committee.

"I only hope now that the wildlife can be left alone to return to this land and start again.

"We must be mindful of the environment and what is around us.

"We have to be proud of Tamworth, the historical capital of Mercia. If we remove all that's green we will be an unattractive place to visit.

"Tamworth is worth more than that, let's not sell ourselves short in the rush to build on every inch of land we have left."

Read more from Tamworth Herald

Do you have something to say? Leave your comment here...

max 4000 characters
  • SercoHater  |  August 23 2014, 6:03PM

    Planning Dept. jokes? Did you hear about the Mad Council which is going to allow (come Hell or High Water!) building 1,500+ houses in North Tamworth, some of them abutting a Flood Plain(!) All of the land targetted is currently green countryside!!!! That holds no barriers for THIS LOT! The joke? To "improve future traffic flows" they're adding an extra lane at the first set of traffic lights which south-bound traffic from North Tamworth hits. "that'll keep the complainers quiet" think the money-makers? The joke? Be patient! They say that preventing the occasional right-turning car (into Comberford Road) will help things along!!!! Trebling the number of houses feeding that (B-road) route will be WELL CATERED FOR!!! You can fool some of the People, some of the time.... But you can't fool ALL of the People, ALL of the time. Planners, developers: We're onto you. We elect councillors to promote sensible practices. Tell us a better joke.... tell us how this huge housing scheme is SENSIBLE???? Then tell us a bigger joke: Explain how a tiny TINKER of roadworks outside QEMS is going to smooth the way to your dreams (and our nightmares)? What you are (not) doing to stop it in its tracks! The degree to which various parties will slither under doors to make money, ABOVE AND BEYOND THE BEST INTERESTS OF A HUGE NUMBER OF EXISTING, GRID-LOCKED RESIDENTS, never ceases to amaze! Herald: please publish all of the councillors' names who DIDN'T veto these plans (all of them). We want to know who to KICK OUT at the first Electoral opportunity!

    |   1